And don't get me started on how some vendors add letters to infections which just further still muddies up detection comparisons. And still another will call it Trojan.Small Downloader. So what one calls another may call Downloader.Win32. Naming conventions are not universal across the security community.
Not to mention that posting of infection names, unless something really big like Koobface, or Waldac is another useless stat. Without that you really cannot compare what one detects to another.
Just an overall note here comparing detections, it's always best to list what some other scanner has detected, such as the file\registry path or cookies(non threats, we don't even detect them, unless specific threats)) or what have you.
0 kommentar(er)
